There is a question nobody in traditional finance wants to answer honestly. It is not about interest rates or valuations or whether the market is overpriced. It is simpler and more dangerous than any of those things. Who gets to shape how millions of people think about money? For most of the twentieth century, the […]
Why WSB and FinTwit Represent Two Futures of Financial Media Read More »
There is an old assumption baked into how we think about financial advice. It goes like this: the more credentials someone has, the more you should trust them. A name, a license, a track record, a Bloomberg terminal in the background of their profile photo. These are supposed to be signals of reliability. Then the
Both groups think the system is rigged. One of them built a religion around that belief. The other made it into a joke. And somehow, the joke has been almost as profitable. Bitcoin maximalists and meme stock degenerates are the two loudest voices in modern retail investing. They overlap in demographics, share the same distrust
Two platforms. Two cultures. Two completely different answers to the same question: what happens when ordinary people start talking about money in public? On one side, a Reddit forum where anonymity is the default and chaos is the aesthetic. On the other, a loose network of named accounts on Twitter where credibility is the currency